Sunday, March 29, 2009

A tribute to all those Bloggers standing like a rock for truth



A tribute to all those Bloggers standing like a rock for truth


I thought this was a fitting tribute to everyone of you out there writing bravely for change and the marginalization of modern psychiatry and pharmaceutical industries.


I know each of you have been called everything from whack jobs, lone wolves, anti-psychiatry crazies, and even Scientologist in this many times thankless journey.


Yet, we write on in spite of the trials and tribulations with unyielding faith in the message of honest truth and change.


I wanted to step out and tip my hat in thanking each and everyone one of you out there in the bloggery world demanding without compromise; that justice be done in the name of humanity and the rights of the discarded victims of an industry that has lost its way in out of control profiteering/Greed, lack of ethical practice, criminal abuse of the very people they have taken a solemn oath to protect and serve, and self serving egocentric doctrines and doctors that have made a mockery of modern medicine.


It’s seems that our voices are beginning to be heard finally;


NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/health/policy/28subpoena.html?_r=3&scp=1&sq=biederman&st=cse

Federal prosecutors have issued a subpoena seeking information about the work and statements of three prominent Harvard researchers who have been the focus of a Congressional investigation into conflicts of interest in medicine.


The researchers — Drs. Joseph Biederman, Thomas Spencer and Timothy E. Wilens — are named in the subpoena, which was sent on Wednesday to Fletch Trammel, a lawyer who represents state attorneys general in lawsuits that claim makers of antipsychotic drugs defrauded state Medicaid programs by improperly marketing their medicines.


The three researchers have advocated increased use of antipsychotic medicines in children and have accepted lucrative consulting agreements from the drugs’ makers. Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican investigating conflicts of interest in medicine, found that each of the researchers had failed to report much of his consulting income to Harvard. Mr. Grassley has also said that Dr. Biederman and Dr. Wilens might have violated federal and university research rules. The controversy led Dr. Biederman to suspend his work with the drug industry.


The subpoena was issued by the Federal District Court for the Massachusetts District; it was sought by the United States attorney in Massachusetts, Michael J. Sullivan, and by the Health and Human Services Department inspector general, Daniel R. Levinson. The subpoena seeks all documents produced in litigation relating to the three researchers as well as transcripts of any depositions of them.


Mr. Trammel said he would “comply with the subpoena and facilitate the U.S. attorney’s investigation in any way I can.”


Peter Spivack, a lawyer for Dr. Biederman, and Mark Paoletta, a lawyer for Dr. Wilens and Dr. Spencer, said they were unaware of a subpoena.


A spokeswoman for Mr. Sullivan declined to comment on the investigation



I give credit to these blogs for this information tip and keeping this important cause in the forefront of our minds, out in the public eye and view, and in the news:

• soulful sepulcher ,
• Furious Seasons
• Invincible Summers

These great blogs are listed with links on my side bar.

As always your comments our welcome

6 comments:

Radagast said...

Hmmm. Interesting. Well, you know what I think of Blibblebam: he's a fucking charlatan, as far as I'm concerned. Sadly, it wouldn't surprise me if this was "only" about money, rather than, erm, "interested" information laundering, shall we say?

Matt

D Bunker said...

Hey Stan;

I just can't blog that 'Son Of A Biederman' the way Stephany, Philip and Kim are doing it. My gag reflex is shot for this month.

And Short Fuse the Deposed is doing Such a Marvelous job of doing Himself, anyway.

I was scoping your links, and just wanted to be sure you knew that some of the Pharmalot commenters were up with their own blog now at

pharmalittle.blogspot.com

Stephany said...

thanks for your writing too Stan, and for the video! I think Biederman doesn't give a crap about anything but his own image and he believes that in his world of close-minded Harvard collegues, so none of them will ever see beyond their bank accounts and "prestige".

Biederman's deposition speaks for itself with his arrogance, what he said about 1000's of employees at Harvard and he's about the only one that counts ...

I hope he has to pay every penny back while he sits in prison on Risperdal weaving baskets.

Richie said...

Not quite on subject but I think you may find this radio program of interest.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00jd5pw

trailerparkbarbie said...

I think a video with the song, "Money" would have been appropriate although I do like the video that you posted.

I accept your gratitude and humble thanks for all of my work. I know that you were POINTING to me since Steph and I are the only regular readers of your blog.LOL

On a serious note, these doctors are no better than street corner drug dealers. No wait...street dealers are better. They don't feed you a bunch of bullshit about the drugs being good for you.

Good post, Stan.

Noe Noe Girl...A Queen of all Trades. said...

Good post Stan the man.

Blog Archive

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

Terms and conditions on the use of the contents of the “Is Something Not Quite Right with Stan - A Mental Health Blog” site are for informational and entertainment purposes only. Stan does not represent or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or reliability of the information or content (collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from this website.

Stan encourages you to make your own health care and legal decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care and/ or legal professional. The information posted here should not be considered medical advice and is not intended to replace consultation with a qualified medical professional if they exist. I do not answer specific medical questions.

Third party information is gathered from sources that Stan believes to be reliable. However, in no event shall Stan, or any third parties mentioned on this site be liable for any damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the content whether or not Stan is advised of the possibility of such damages.

Stan reserves the right, in its sole discretion and without any obligation, to make improvements to, or correct any error or omissions in any portion of the displayed materials.

You hereby acknowledge that any reliance upon any Materials shall be at your sole risk.

Disclaimer of Liability

The user assumes all responsibility and risk for the use of this web site and the Internet generally. Under no circumstances, including negligence, shall anyone involved in creating or maintaining this web site, or shall the website writer or any commenter’s be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, or lost profits that result from the use or inability to use the web site and/or any other web sites which are linked to this site.

Nor shall they be liable for any such damages including, but not limited to, reliance by a visitor on any information obtained via the web site; or that result from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletion of files, viruses, errors, defects, or any failure of performance, communications failure, theft, destruction or unauthorized access.

ALL CONTENT ON THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU ON AN "AS IS," "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. Stan MAKES NO WARRANTY AS TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, CURRENCY, OR RELIABILITY OF ANY CONTENT AVAILABLE THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.

In states which do not allow some or all of the above limitations of liability, liability shall be limited to the greatest extent allowed by law.

Disclaimer of Endorsement - Reference to any products, services, hypertext link to the third parties or other information by trade name, trademark, supplier or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by me. Nor is an endorsement by me is implied by such links. They are for convenience only, as an index in a public library.

Information Subject to Change - Any information on this web site may be removed without notice. Information may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Furthermore, the information may change from time to time without any notice.

GENERAL INFORMATION - The information contained in this online site is presented and intended to provide a broad understanding and knowledge critical to psychiatric practices and humorous social interaction. The information should not be considered complete and should not be used in place of communication and consultation.

NO WARRANTIES “Is Something Not Quite Right With Stan - A Mental Health Blog” MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES THAT USE OF THE WEB SITE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR TAKING ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT ANY CONTENT YOU MAY OBTAIN FROM THE WEB SITE IS FREE OF VIRUSES.

This site is not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for public debate about medical conduct and for entertainment purposes. The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify issues mentioned herein. This site is designed strictly to provide information for critical, literary, academic, entertainment, and public usage. A qualified and trustworthy medical professional must be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.; if they exist in all actuality or truth.