Sunday, November 15, 2009

Is the DOJ, Department of Justice Fine (500M) CIA (Corporate Integrity Agreement) with AstraZeneca another case of a coverup and sweetheart agreement

Is the DOJ (Department of Justice) Fine & CIA (Corporate Integrity Agreement) with AstraZeneca another case of a cover-up/sweetheart deal to avoid further penalties

Pharmalot has reported this week the news that AZ is in the final stages of completing a deal with the government over their shady and criminal actions with the drug Seroquel

AstraZeneca Pays $520M To Settle Seroquel Probes

AstraZeneca has agreed to pay $520 million to settle two federal investigations and two whistleblower lawsuits over its Seroquel antipsychotic.

Antipsychotics, you may recall, have become extremely controversial in recent years as the pills were more widely prescribed for young children and the elderly for indications not approved by the FDA (see this). In some nursing homes, for instance, seniors are experiencing tremors and a higher risk of harmful falls or even death while on the meds, which are known to cause weight gain and diabetes.

The investigation, which was underway at the same time that AstraZeneca has been battling numerous lawsuits over allegedly undisclosed Seroquel side effects, was led by the US Department of Justice’s Philadelphia office. Interestingly, the investigators reviewed not only Seroquel sales and marketing practices, but some physicians who participated in Seroquel clinical trials.

Separately, at least 34 states are pursuing separate investigations of AstraZeneca’s marketing practices as part of a joint investigation and others may be conducting their own probes. In other words, AstraZeneca may have to dole out more money for its practices.

An AstraZeneca spokesman says the drugmaker “is committed to strong, effective compliance programs, both in the U.S. and globally, to embed a culture of ethics and integrity in all our business practices. It has been and remains a key goal.”



Past and Present AstraZeneca - Seroquel Marketing and Senior Management Team

______________________________________

What we see is missing with glaring regularity in these news reports; is how these "sealed" proceedings effect ongoing civil litigation for injuries incurred from the use of Seroquel by patients. To date there are an estimated 12,000+ civil complaints filed against AZ over Seroquel's metabolic effects on users (including massive weight gain, diabetes, and a whole host of other adverse side effects including death).

You would rationally and logically believe the DOJ would be forth coming with all the evidence they have accumulated in these matters? But this may not be the case here.

AstraZeneca has been down this road before; pleading guilty to criminal activities and signed an CIA agreement with the DOJ. They then continued to go about engaging in the same/like criminal behaviors without hesitation.

So will the DOJ hold them accountable for the first agreement they made to clean up their act? It appears they will not in all truth; DOJ will just have them sign another CIA, pay a small fine (in comparison to the massive profits they have made while conducting criminals activities), and AZ continues shady business as usual.

Let me attempt to put this into some type of normal speak context for everyone here:

Let's say you are arrested for a DUI (driving under the influence). You plead guilty and are assessed a fine, sign an agreement to attend some alcohol abuse classes, and are given probation in lieu of jail time if you agree to not engage in this illegal activity again.

A month later you are again arrested for another DUI. Now normally the court would not look to kindly upon such a behavior; probably revoking your license, levee even a larger fine, and you would probably spend some time in jail while picking up trash alone the interstate.

Now let's say you do your jail time and are arrested once more for another DUI. This time you are involved in an accident that caused serious injury to another. You would rationally expect the court to throw the book at you so to speak. You would probably face not only some serious prison time for your actions; but also be liable for paying considerable damages to the injured parties.

This analogy could be considered a rational response to an illegal act in these cases by most.

Yet if you happen to be a giant Pharmaceutical Corporation doing business in America this rational and logical argument does not appear to apply.

AstraZenena entered into a CIA agreement before with the DOJ in 2003.

_______________________________________

from soulful sepulcher

FRIDAY, JUNE 20, 2003

WWW.USDOJ.GOV

CIV
(302) 573-6277

ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP PLEADS GUILTY
TO HEALTHCARE CRIME; COMPANY AGREES TO PAY
$355 MILLION TO SETTLE CHARGES
____________________________________________

Yet here we are again with our government (acting in the capacity of the DOJ) allowing a repeated criminal offender to walk away from their crimes that have injured and maimed thousands upon thousands of innocent parties with little more than another backroom deal to avoid real punishment.

The people must demand better accountability from are judicial and enforcement bodies in relationship to repeat corporate offenders. We need to demand transparency and rational penalties; or these crimes against all American's will continue unabated with unimaginable cost to each and everyone of us.

Why you might ask? It's quite simple really; For these large corporations its more profitable to continue criminals activities, sign agreements they have no intention of following, and pay unsubstantial fines; than it is to be ethical, moral, and conduct honest business practices. The built in financial incentive is to not play by the rules of law or operate with responsible integrity.

We the People expect and demand more from the justice system. I write this post to let the DOJ know, we the people are watching and reporting upon your actions.

Read more and connect the dots yourself at these and many more links to great sites/information located on my sidebar:

pharmagossip-google-sidewiki

PharmaGossip's Google Sidewiki entry about AstraZeneca's Seroquel Scandal:

http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fpharmagossip.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F10%2Fastrazeneca-to-pay-520-million-to.html&usd=1&usg=AFQjCNFv_8pYTbZVYUI8cXWuKhre7PRGVQ

1 comment:

Stephany said...

Great post, insightful, and well done!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

Terms and conditions on the use of the contents of the “Is Something Not Quite Right with Stan - A Mental Health Blog” site are for informational and entertainment purposes only. Stan does not represent or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or reliability of the information or content (collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from this website.

Stan encourages you to make your own health care and legal decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care and/ or legal professional. The information posted here should not be considered medical advice and is not intended to replace consultation with a qualified medical professional if they exist. I do not answer specific medical questions.

Third party information is gathered from sources that Stan believes to be reliable. However, in no event shall Stan, or any third parties mentioned on this site be liable for any damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the content whether or not Stan is advised of the possibility of such damages.

Stan reserves the right, in its sole discretion and without any obligation, to make improvements to, or correct any error or omissions in any portion of the displayed materials.

You hereby acknowledge that any reliance upon any Materials shall be at your sole risk.

Disclaimer of Liability

The user assumes all responsibility and risk for the use of this web site and the Internet generally. Under no circumstances, including negligence, shall anyone involved in creating or maintaining this web site, or shall the website writer or any commenter’s be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, or lost profits that result from the use or inability to use the web site and/or any other web sites which are linked to this site.

Nor shall they be liable for any such damages including, but not limited to, reliance by a visitor on any information obtained via the web site; or that result from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletion of files, viruses, errors, defects, or any failure of performance, communications failure, theft, destruction or unauthorized access.

ALL CONTENT ON THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU ON AN "AS IS," "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. Stan MAKES NO WARRANTY AS TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, CURRENCY, OR RELIABILITY OF ANY CONTENT AVAILABLE THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.

In states which do not allow some or all of the above limitations of liability, liability shall be limited to the greatest extent allowed by law.

Disclaimer of Endorsement - Reference to any products, services, hypertext link to the third parties or other information by trade name, trademark, supplier or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by me. Nor is an endorsement by me is implied by such links. They are for convenience only, as an index in a public library.

Information Subject to Change - Any information on this web site may be removed without notice. Information may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Furthermore, the information may change from time to time without any notice.

GENERAL INFORMATION - The information contained in this online site is presented and intended to provide a broad understanding and knowledge critical to psychiatric practices and humorous social interaction. The information should not be considered complete and should not be used in place of communication and consultation.

NO WARRANTIES “Is Something Not Quite Right With Stan - A Mental Health Blog” MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES THAT USE OF THE WEB SITE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR TAKING ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT ANY CONTENT YOU MAY OBTAIN FROM THE WEB SITE IS FREE OF VIRUSES.

This site is not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for public debate about medical conduct and for entertainment purposes. The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify issues mentioned herein. This site is designed strictly to provide information for critical, literary, academic, entertainment, and public usage. A qualified and trustworthy medical professional must be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.; if they exist in all actuality or truth.