Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Was The Swine Flu - H1N1 Pandemic just a marketing hoax to promote flu vaccines, along with Big Pharma profits

Was The Swine Flu - H1N1 Pandemic just a marketing hoax to promote flu vaccines, along with Big Pharma Profits

We have all seen the headlines over and over again about the scary "SWINE FLU" pandemic warnings and endless hype about how it relates to your health. If you were to skim through these headlines and articles you would think we were preparing for the next "Black Plague" (an estimated 1/3 of the worlds population bit the bullet on that one) or even the end of the known modern world.

Yet where are all the piles of death and body bags? Was this just a slick marketing campaign using FEAR and a HOAX as a tool to make huge profits? Was our own government in bed with huge Pharmaceutical Corporate Interest in a massive smoke and mirrors pandemic job.

Just a few headline examples to get those underachieving neurons humming:
  • 800,000 Doses of Children's H1N1 Vaccine Recalled

Now comes this very interesting article and investigative report all about this so called Swine Flu/H1Ni pandemic. As it has been said; "read and weep"

Was or is the H1N1 Flu lots of hype or a very real threat?

I guess that has been left up to you to decide for yourself.

Of course, I personally have little doubt that deep in the bowels of some secret government laboratories throughout the industrialized world sits stock piles of very real and dangerous pathogens that could be weapon-ized and unleashed upon the world.

I know, call me paranoid or crazy here; but there is little profit in actually mass death; but just possibly huge dollars in those amazing Pharmacological treatments leading up to that dubious unproductive state.

Let's just say when in doubt:
"Follow the Money"


from Alliance for Human Research Protection - Flu Vaccine Fraud

Flu Vaccine Fraud: WHO 'Mr Flu' Under Investigation For Gross Conflicts of Interest

Thursday, 10 December 2009

One after another of the recently proclaimed Flu “pandemics” has turned out to be a fraudulent marketing hoax to promote flu vaccines.

Each hoax was cooked up by Big Pharma and their paid, highly placed scientists who have penetrated both national and international health organizations.
Nationally and internationally, healthcare policies are being shaped by those who have gross conflicts of interest. Vaccines are being promoted (even mandated) in the absence of scientific evidence to support mass vaccinations.

Last month, CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, blew the lid on the swine flu pandemic hoax and the US Center for Disease. ee her two part interview with Dr. Mercola:

See: CBS Reporter Blows the Lid Off Swine Flu Hysteria and CBS Reveals Cases Overestimated

CBS News and the CDC contradict each other completely.

In her three-month U.S. investigation that included state-by-state flu test results, Attkisson uncovered facts that contradict the Centers for Disease Control policy statements:

CBS News Finds H1N1 Tests were "Overwhelmingly Negative."Indeed, H1N1 flu cases are NOT as prevalent as feared:

"If you've been diagnosed "probable" or "presumed" 2009 H1N1 or "swine flu" in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn't have H1N1 flu. In fact, you probably didn't have flu at all."

For example, Attkisson discovered that:

* In Florida, 83% of specimens that were presumed to be swine flu were negative for all flu when tested!
* In California, 86% of suspected H1N1 specimens were not swine flu or any flu; only 2% were confirmed swine flu.
* In Alaska, 93% of suspected swine flu specimens were negative for all flu types; only 1 percent was H1N1 flu.

CBS reports that in late July 2009 the CDC advised states to STOP testing for H1N1 flu, and they also stopped counting individual cases. Their rationale for this, according to CBS News, was that it was a waste of resources to test for H1N1 flu because it was already confirmed as an epidemic.

What evidence of an epidemic?

"of the vast majority of the presumed swine flu cases recognized by trained physicians, the vast majority were not flu at all. They weren’t swine flu or regular flu; they were some other sort of upper respiratory infection.” That is what the CDC doesn’t want the American public to know.

“The CDC explained that one of the reasons they quit counting was because of all the flu that’s out there, most are swine flu. Well, that’s true. Most of the flu that was out there was indeed swine flu, but they failed to say that most of the suspected flu was nothing at all. And I think that’s the caveat the public just didn’t know,” Attkisson explains.

Especially disturbing is the stonewalling and obfuscation by the Obama Administration:
Attkisson says, "This may be the first time I was denied that expedited processing from Freedom of Information that we’re entitled to as members of the press; a letter from HHS or Health and Human Services (the CDC is under HHS) said to me that one of the reasons they’re denying my expedited processing is because this is not a matter of “widespread and exceptional media or public interest.”

In other words, even as the President declared the swine flu a "national public health emergency" the CDC doesn’t think that questions about swine flu prevalence "are a matter of widespread and exceptional media or public interest...”

As is the case genrally in healthcare fraud, conflicts of interest are rampant in the vaccination infrastructure. CBS reported that:

"The same people who are regulating and promoting vaccines are also evaluating vaccine safety. For instance, Dr. Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia earned at least $29 million as part of a $182-million sale by the hospital of its worldwide royalty interest in the Merck Rotateq vaccine. He also formerly sat on the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine"

A riveting, insightful article, by F. William Engdahl , author of “Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order,” documents how gross conflicts of interest have corrupted the World Health Organization and international vaccine policy. The article is posted the website of Financial Sense Editorials, (which is geared toward investors).

This well documented article sheds light on how a well positioned Dutch scientist and the World Health Organization helped Big Pharma (or as Engdahl refers to it, “the Pharma mafia”) generate a global hysteria about the avian flu and the swine flu—in order to generate a demand for flu vaccines.


“The man with the nickname “Dr Flu”, Professor Albert Osterhaus, of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam Holland has been named by Dutch media researchers as the person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the billions of euros in vaccines allegedly aimed at H1N1.”

“More careful investigation into the Osterhaus Affair suggests that the world-renowned Dutch Virologist may be at the very center of a multi-billion Euro pandemic fraud which has used human beings in effect as human guinea pigs with untested vaccines and in cases now emerging resulting in deaths or severe bodily paralysis or injury. “

Privatization (i.e., Big Pharma influence) has corrupted the World Health Organization:

“In the past decade the WHO, in order to boost funds at its disposal entered into what it calls “public private partnerships.” Instead of receiving its funds solely from member United Nations governments as its original purpose had been, WHO today receives almost double its normal UN budget in the form of grants and financial support from private industry. The industry? The very drug and vaccine makers who benefit from decisions like the June 2009 H1N1 Pandemic emergency declaration. As the main financiers of the WHO bureaucracy, naturally the Pharma Mafia and their friends receive what has been called “open door red carpet treatment” in Geneva."17

The ‘Bird Shit Hoax’

“Albert Osterhaus is no small fish. He stands at the global nexus of every major virus panic of the past two decades from the mysterious SARS deaths in HongKong, where current WHO Director Margaret Chan got her start in her career as a local health official. According to his official bio at the European Commission, Osterhaus was engaged in April 2003, at the height of the panic over SARS (Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome) in Hong Kong. The EU report states, “he again showed his skill at moving fast to tackle a serious problem. Within three weeks he had proved that the disease was caused by a newly discovered coronavirus that resides in civet cats, other carnivorous animals or bats.” 5

“Then Osterhaus moved on, this time publicizing dangers of what he claimed was H5N1 Avian Flu. In 1997 he already began sounding the alarm following the death in Hong Kong of a three-year-old who Osterhaus learned had had direct contact with birds. Osterhaus went into high gear lobbying across Holland and Europe claiming that a deadly new mutation of avian flu had jumped to humans and that drastic measures were required. He claimed to be the first scientist in the world to show that H5N1 could be transferred into humans.” 6

It never did manage to mutate, but, as Engdahl points out, Dr. Osterhaus was ready to “do the experiments,” presumably for a hefty fee.

The corruption of the WHO became most apparent when it declared the swine flu (H1N1) a pandemic emergency without a shred of substantiating evidence.

“When no mass wave of human deaths from Avian Flu materialized and after Roche, maker of Tamiflu and GlaxoSmithKline had banked billions of dollars in profits from worldwide government stockpiling of their dangerous and reportedly ineffective antiviral drugs, Tamiflu by Roche, and Relenza by GlaxoSmithKline, Osterhaus and other WHO advisers turned to other greener pastures.

By April 2009 their search seemed rewarded as a small Mexican village in Veracruz reported a case of a small child ill with what had been diagnosed as “Swine Flu” or H1N1. With indecent haste the propaganda apparatus of the World Health Organization in Geneva went into gear anth statements from the director-general Dr Margaret Chan, about a possible danger of a global pandemic. Chan made such irresponsible statements as declaring “a public health emergency of international concern.” 12

"In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:

“…one of the extraordinary features of this influenza -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.”

SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?

Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...18

When asked if the WHO had deliberately declared the Pandemic Emergency in order to create a huge market for H1N1 vaccines and drugs, Jefferson replied, “Don't you think there's something noteworthy about the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of pandemic? The old definition was a new virus, which went around quickly, for which you didn't have immunity, and which created a high morbidity and mortality rate. Now the last two have been dropped, and that's how swine flu has been categorized as a pandemic.”19

Full documented article, WHO ‘Mr Flu’ under investigation for gross conflict of interest
by F. William Engdahl

December 8, 2009
Full documented article, WHO ‘Mr Flu’ under investigation for gross conflict of interest
by F. William Engdahl
December 8, 2009

Links to further reading on this topic:

Safety Concerns about the of H1N1 Swine flu Vaccine & Public Policy

Humor When Mr. Germ Attacks and more

nytimes - Advisers on Vaccines Often Have Conflicts


notepad publishing said...

Read the full article with all media references at:

H1N1 notepad
April 2009 to Today

December 11 to December 20 2009

December 12 NHF publishes ‘Forced Vaccinations, Government, and the Public Interest‘.

December 14 LabVirus writes ‘As the H1N1 vaccine is made widely available starting today for the next week in cities throughout the USA, masses line up to be sterilized, paralyzed, irreversibly harmed, and some – killed.’

December 15 ResistNet publishes ‘Agenda 21 is it, you decide - Bioterrorism!‘ and Truth11 writes ‘Why is the Government of Canada running adds for the Flu Vaccine without any warnings | Population Reduction’ and TheFluCase writes ‘Reports of Serious Side Effects For Swine Flu Jab Soar in France. Only Internet Reports’ and Attorney At Law writes ‘H1N1 Vaccine Doses Recalled; May Not Be Strong Enough‘.

December 16 the Examiner writes ‘Several people get GBS after swine flu vaccinations, yet some doses ‘not potent enough’’ and Psyorg writes ‘Bacteria wouldn’t opt for a swine flu shot‘.

December 1 to December 10 2009

December 3 2009 Pharma Times publishes ‘The swine flu pandemic has been named as the “most ambitious scam and corruption of our time‘ and the Examiner writes ‘Many pregnant mothers are reporting miscarriages shortly after taking the swine flu vaccine‘.

December 4 WorldmWorld publishes an ‘Open Letter to all Corporate Media Journalists‘ and GlobalVoices writes ‘Russia: Blogger arrested for pneumonic plague rumors‘.

December 5 Thoughts writes ‘Mounting Debilities and Deaths from H1N1 Vaccine‘.

December 6 notepad publishing writes ‘’Joining the dots‘.

December 7 Political Cortex writes ‘people are genuinely concerned for their health. Not because of H1N1, but because of the propaganda machine rearing its ugly head‘.

December 8 INPhobe reports ‘CIA Operated Aerial Spraying Plane Carrying “Mutated” Virus Shot Down in China‘ and Market Oracle publishes ‘World Health Organisation ‘Mr Swine Flu’ Under Investigation for Gross Conflict of Interest’

December 9 Age of Autism writes ‘Is One Man to Blame for the WorldWide H1N1 Panic?’.

December 10 NWOObserver writes ‘Mega Corruption Scandal At The WHO‘ and notepad publishing writes ‘The Godfather of Vaccine?’ and Last day Watchers publishes ‘Swine-flu bribe fever! U.N.’s H1N1 scientists linked to companies making vaccin‘.

Read the full article with all media references at:

Stephany said...

Well, you questioned it, and now there could be some internal documents to prove it:

Expert panel to view confidential swine flu papers

Expert panel examining WHO's swine flu handling to review confidential contracts with industry

""We will want to have access to certain confidential documents that may be in place here at WHO or elsewhere," Fineberg told reporters in Geneva.

The documents include "contractual or letters of understanding" between the pharmaceutical industry and WHO, he said. "Some of the agreements with industry that we would like to examine have been considered confidential," but so far all of the panel's requests have been met, he said.

WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl said he couldn't immediately comment.

Under criticism for how the outbreak was handled, WHO Director-General Margaret Chan convened the panel last month and urged its members to conduct a "credible and independent review" that she promised would be transparent.

The Geneva-based agency has denied allegations that it gave pharmaceutical companies privileged access to national decision-makers."

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

Terms and conditions on the use of the contents of the “Is Something Not Quite Right with Stan - A Mental Health Blog” site are for informational and entertainment purposes only. Stan does not represent or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or reliability of the information or content (collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from this website.

Stan encourages you to make your own health care and legal decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care and/ or legal professional. The information posted here should not be considered medical advice and is not intended to replace consultation with a qualified medical professional if they exist. I do not answer specific medical questions.

Third party information is gathered from sources that Stan believes to be reliable. However, in no event shall Stan, or any third parties mentioned on this site be liable for any damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the content whether or not Stan is advised of the possibility of such damages.

Stan reserves the right, in its sole discretion and without any obligation, to make improvements to, or correct any error or omissions in any portion of the displayed materials.

You hereby acknowledge that any reliance upon any Materials shall be at your sole risk.

Disclaimer of Liability

The user assumes all responsibility and risk for the use of this web site and the Internet generally. Under no circumstances, including negligence, shall anyone involved in creating or maintaining this web site, or shall the website writer or any commenter’s be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, or lost profits that result from the use or inability to use the web site and/or any other web sites which are linked to this site.

Nor shall they be liable for any such damages including, but not limited to, reliance by a visitor on any information obtained via the web site; or that result from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletion of files, viruses, errors, defects, or any failure of performance, communications failure, theft, destruction or unauthorized access.


In states which do not allow some or all of the above limitations of liability, liability shall be limited to the greatest extent allowed by law.

Disclaimer of Endorsement - Reference to any products, services, hypertext link to the third parties or other information by trade name, trademark, supplier or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by me. Nor is an endorsement by me is implied by such links. They are for convenience only, as an index in a public library.

Information Subject to Change - Any information on this web site may be removed without notice. Information may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Furthermore, the information may change from time to time without any notice.

GENERAL INFORMATION - The information contained in this online site is presented and intended to provide a broad understanding and knowledge critical to psychiatric practices and humorous social interaction. The information should not be considered complete and should not be used in place of communication and consultation.


This site is not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for public debate about medical conduct and for entertainment purposes. The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify issues mentioned herein. This site is designed strictly to provide information for critical, literary, academic, entertainment, and public usage. A qualified and trustworthy medical professional must be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.; if they exist in all actuality or truth.