Saturday, February 19, 2011

Bring Stigma 2 Them - & The NAMI & CABF affiliated campaign "Bring Change 2 Mind"

Bring Stigma 2 Them - & The NAMI & CABF affiliated campaign "Bring Change 2 Mind"

About Time 2 bring a bit of truth 2 this propaganda campaign &

If you go to the links above; they will give the same old song & dance about chemical imbalance theory, genetics hypothesis, and that mental illness is just like cancer or diabetes. They will jump up and down professing these stigmatized individuals must take their medications for life ( better classified as the modern chemical lobotomy).....what they won't say, is that they really have no proof or reliable science to back up the claims they make. What they won't say is the drugs they are raving about can and do cause significant damage that do far outweigh their actual benefits.

Don't fall for the propaganda, don't fall prey to the labels, stigmatization, dangerous mental & physical consequences of these pharmaceutical industry shills.

Please do your own research and draw your own informed conclusions.

Don't become just another T-shirt slogan

What BC2M also don't tell you is that they have either been directly funded by Big Pharmaceutical Corporate Interest, or are tied closely to another supposed advocacy organization that is. They won't tell that their governing advisory boards are stacked full with doctors making incredible amounts of money working & speaking for the pharmaceutical industry.

They really really don't want you looking in their dirty linen closets and revealing the truth about their drug industry marketing efforts.

Of course labels would never cause anyone to face stigma correct?

American Court approves of forced torture & human rights abuse against it's citizens

American Court approves of forced torture & human rights abuse against it's citizens

Elizabeth and Forced Shock: An intro

Elizabeth Ellis of Moorhead, Minnesota has received more than a dozen involuntary court-ordered electroshocks in the Winter of 2011, including an outpatient forced electroshock on 12 January 2011.

Elizabeth, 67, is a retired school counselor and teacher, with a master's degree in counseling. She strongly objects to electroshock, and its impact on her memory and mind.

So on 28 January 2011, Elizabeth sat at home with her supportive husband Robert (photo on right). Elizabeth refused to report for another outpatient ECT - also known as electroconvulsive therapy.

Apparently, her "sit in" has cost Elizabeth her liberty on 18 February 2011. She faces "months" of "maintenance" forced electroshock.

Elizabeth K. Ellis: Electroshock Survivor

Most recent news:

19 February 2011: Probably because Anoka psychiatric institution was full, we understand Elizabeth was driven quite some distance away from her home to a psychiatric facility. When we discover the name of the facility, we'll announce it.

18 February 2011 - Alert 3:

Tonight, MindFreedom was informed by Elizabeth's daughter, Susan Opp, that Elizabeth has been picked up and placed in a hospital.

Because the Minn. Governor's office has been non-responsive after three weeks, local advocates suggest concerned people contact Elizabeth's elected US Congresspeople:

US Sen. Al Franken web form:

U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar:

U.S. Rep Collin Peterson:

Note: To use the Peterson web form, you need a district zipcode. You can address your comment 'c/o Elizabeth Ellis' and use her address:

606 20TH AVE S


Read more....

18 February 2011:

Exactly three weeks after MindFreedom discussed Elizabeth's case at length with Governor of Minnesota's constituent outreach staff person Katie Troyer, Ms. Troyer has yet to even return a call or e-mail to MindFreedom.

A source in Minnesota told MindFreedom that issues involving mental health may make the new Governor Mark Dayton personally uncomfortable. On 27 Dec. 2009, the Minnesota Star Tribune reported that in a brief "10 minute" interview, Dayton - then running for Governor - disclosed that he himself had been under years of mental health care for serious depression and alcoholism, but he did not want to release any of the treatment details. At the time, there was even unsubstantiated speculation this may have included electroshock. The reporter called him an "enigmatic millionaire."

Governor Dayton has a right to say nothing about his own mental health care. But he and his staff are wrong to say nothing about the human right of Elizabeth Dayton to say "no" to electroshock.

Timeline of Elizabeth Campaign, With Background Info

16 February 2011

Documents now on web: You may now download PDF copies of the signed court and agency documents that order the involuntary electroshock -- including on an outpatient basis -- of Elizabeth Ellis of Minnesota. Elizabeth faxed these documents to MindFreedom, anticipating that she may lose her liberty:

Plea from Elizabeth: Elizabeth e-mails a moving statement about the court decision to send out a sheriff to bring her in for forced electroshock.

MindFreedom issues Alert 2,about the court documents Elizabeth received threatening to lock her up again and forcibly electroshock her, because she refused her outpatient electroshock.

How Can the Mental Health System Get an "Egypt" Moment, blogs David Oaks, MFI Director: Oppressed people in Egypt rose up in nonviolent revolution. Then why not those concerned about the extreme and overwhelming torture people like Elizabeth experience from a corrupt mental health industry?

Now on Facebook: The Cause to stop the forced electroshock of Elizabeth Ellis, is on Facebook, please join in and comment.

12 February - Elizabeth on Web Radio: Hear Elizabeth Ellis interviewed on the first half of the MindFreedom Web Radio Hour, free here.

29 January 2011 - FDA Panel Says ECT Device "Hazardous": By coincidence, the exact day after Elizabeth said "no" to her forced outpatient electroshock, an FDA panel voted that the device is unsafe, and should finally be tested by the FDA for safety for the first time in its more than 70 years of use in the USA.

28 January 2011 -- The day Elizabeth and her husband stayed at home, and refused to report for her scheduled involuntary outpatient electroshock by Nadeem Haider at the electroshock clinic in nearby Fargo.

27 January 2011 Original Alert that MindFreedom e-mailed out about Elizabeth Ellis forced electroshock.

23 January 2011 - Elizabeth, who is a member of MindFreedom, announces on a stunned MFI international member teleconference that she is under a court order to have involuntary electroshocks on an outpatient basis. MindFreedom works with Elizabeth on an alert.

12 January 2011: Elizabeth does agree to her initial involuntary outpatient electroshock, going to nearby Fargo for an electroshock administered by psychiatrist Nadeem Haider.

5 January 2011: Elizabeth is released from Anoka psychiatric institution, with a 'provisional' release that says she must continue to receive involuntary outpatient electroshocks.

20 September 2010: Elizabeth is locked up in a psychiatric facility. She will eventually receive a dozen involuntary electroshocks during several months of institutionalization.

Elizabeth said her records show she even had to be held in a chair and dragged to the procedure, because she felt so strongly opposed. Her memory of these events has been shattered, and she has to rely on her records for this information.

Elizabeth and her daughter, Susan Opp, agree about the circumstances that led up to this psychiatric lock-up. However, mother and daughter strongly disagree about whether the lock-up was necessary, and whether involuntary electroshock was called for.

Elizabeth's 69-year-old sister had been dying from cancer for some time. Elizabeth was of course upset. While MindFreedom has not heard of any report of danger to self or others by Elizabeth, some felt that Elizabeth's emotional reactions at this time were "unusual," such as keeping her eyes closed in the hospital even while walking, or keeping her mouth open with her head at an angle.

Literally hours after Elizabeth's sister died, literally feet away from her sister's death bed in the hospital, Elizabeth's daughter, Susan, decided to hold her mom in a small room, and ask psychiatric personnel to lock up her mother on the spot for a psychiatric evaluation. Susan told MindFreedom she felt this made sense since it was convenient because Elizabeth was at the hospital anyway for her sister's death.

The mental health system claims that Elizabeth lost weight in the institution, and needed forced electroshock to live. Elizabeth said her weight loss was not life-threatening, and that since she's been out she's been healthy, active, and eating. Her husband Robert agrees, and supports Elizabeth's right to be free of electroshock.

According to Elizabeth, Susan herself is in the mental health industry, working at a mental health facility in Fargo called Prairie St. John's with people diagnosed with mental and addiction issues, and going to nursing school.

More info about Elizabeth campaign and electroshock:

Minnesota residents: MindFreedom Twin Cities is active and meeting, you can network with them here:

Minnesota & Forced Electroshock: Elizabeth is not the only Minnesotan ordered to have involuntary outpatient electroshock. MindFreedom International held a successful international campaign on behalf of Ray Sandford to stop his own forced shock. Read about Ray's campaign here.

MindFreedom has a united "Zap Back Initiative" chaired by shock survivor Mary Maddock, to network all individuals and groups fighting electroshock human rights violations. Join MindFreedom and then get on the MFI Zapback Email List, where the Elizabeth Campaign is being coordinated.

Lots more on the topic electroshock can be found on MindFreedom web site.

Outpatient Commitment: Because of the Tucson shooting tragedy, the month of January has been filled with media coverage promoting laws expanding involuntary outpatient psychiatric procedures, but hardly ever quoting representatives of groups run by mental health consumers and psychiatric survivors with the "other side of the story." But Elizabeth's struggle shows the logical conclusion of a simplistic solution that makes our homes into psychiatric institutions. Click here to read about media bigotry in mental health coverage of the Arizona shootings.

Support Elizabeth!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

Terms and conditions on the use of the contents of the “Is Something Not Quite Right with Stan - A Mental Health Blog” site are for informational and entertainment purposes only. Stan does not represent or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or reliability of the information or content (collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from this website.

Stan encourages you to make your own health care and legal decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care and/ or legal professional. The information posted here should not be considered medical advice and is not intended to replace consultation with a qualified medical professional if they exist. I do not answer specific medical questions.

Third party information is gathered from sources that Stan believes to be reliable. However, in no event shall Stan, or any third parties mentioned on this site be liable for any damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the content whether or not Stan is advised of the possibility of such damages.

Stan reserves the right, in its sole discretion and without any obligation, to make improvements to, or correct any error or omissions in any portion of the displayed materials.

You hereby acknowledge that any reliance upon any Materials shall be at your sole risk.

Disclaimer of Liability

The user assumes all responsibility and risk for the use of this web site and the Internet generally. Under no circumstances, including negligence, shall anyone involved in creating or maintaining this web site, or shall the website writer or any commenter’s be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, or lost profits that result from the use or inability to use the web site and/or any other web sites which are linked to this site.

Nor shall they be liable for any such damages including, but not limited to, reliance by a visitor on any information obtained via the web site; or that result from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletion of files, viruses, errors, defects, or any failure of performance, communications failure, theft, destruction or unauthorized access.


In states which do not allow some or all of the above limitations of liability, liability shall be limited to the greatest extent allowed by law.

Disclaimer of Endorsement - Reference to any products, services, hypertext link to the third parties or other information by trade name, trademark, supplier or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by me. Nor is an endorsement by me is implied by such links. They are for convenience only, as an index in a public library.

Information Subject to Change - Any information on this web site may be removed without notice. Information may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Furthermore, the information may change from time to time without any notice.

GENERAL INFORMATION - The information contained in this online site is presented and intended to provide a broad understanding and knowledge critical to psychiatric practices and humorous social interaction. The information should not be considered complete and should not be used in place of communication and consultation.


This site is not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for public debate about medical conduct and for entertainment purposes. The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify issues mentioned herein. This site is designed strictly to provide information for critical, literary, academic, entertainment, and public usage. A qualified and trustworthy medical professional must be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.; if they exist in all actuality or truth.